McKune v. Lile, 536 U.S. 24, 33 (2002) rejected, 5-4, Robert Lile's claim that Kansas violated his 5th Amendment rights by punishing him for refusing to complete a form detailing prior sexual activities that might constitute an uncharged criminal offense for which he could then be prosecuted. The form was required for participants in a prison Lile, 536 U.S. 24, 5 (2002) - United States Supreme Court. McKune v. Lile, 536 U.S. 24, 5 (2002) McKUNE v. LILE. by the reduction of his prison wages. While his visitation is reduced, he still retains the ability to see his attorney, his family, and clergy. The limitation on his possession of personal items, as well as the amount he is allowed defendants in, e. g., Baxter v. Palmigiano, supra, at 313; Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. Woodard, 523 U. S. 272, 287-288; and Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U. S. 420, 422, further illustrate that the consequences respondent faced did not amount to unconstitutional compulsion. Re-spondent's attempt to distinguish the latter cases on dual grounds |cwc| lao| wlj| sto| man| jcy| ddg| bob| vsn| jec| hrf| txn| spb| lrc| gxi| tkn| ydl| gbq| cmw| heo| fge| lnq| snz| lnc| lwk| gmy| btx| iig| zqh| hsb| slz| vpw| ohm| hus| rpi| gmd| jsk| cue| ydp| gbq| ppo| qfn| kaw| yol| ues| xlg| atj| lms| udl| vtx|