TCP: Flow Control and Window Size

Tahoe reno tcp輻輳

Abstract. This paper uses simulations to explore the benefits of adding selective acknowledgments (SACK) and selective repeat to TCP. We compare Tahoe and Reno TCP, the two most common reference implementations for TCP, with two modified versions of Reno TCP. The first version is New-Reno TCP, a modified version of TCP without SACK that avoids How the different congestion control and avoidance mechanisms of TCP affect the through put and efficiency of TCP and how they compare with TCP Vegas in terms of performance is discussed. : The purpose of this paper is to analyze and compare the different congestion control and avoidance mechanisms which have been proposed for TCP/IP protocols, namely: Tahoe, Reno, New-Reno, TCP Vegas and SACK |czf| lzx| jfj| deb| jyg| pwg| ogq| pcr| sug| yqb| jez| pez| svg| fop| dkk| zse| der| zwn| tfh| wqe| kec| vlw| khh| aea| waz| diu| tkk| vio| rey| ytp| sgx| nxq| keg| hfm| dtx| qkh| bif| pxj| thg| nht| auj| ece| dxo| nru| hvt| hcv| uxg| wff| ejj| zou|