In State of U.P. v. Chhotey Lal 2 the following passage from the judgment of a three-Judge Bench of this Court in State Of H.P v. Mango Ram. Ram3 on the meaning of consent for the purpose of the offence of rape as defined in Section 375 IPC, is quoted: (Chhotey Lal case2, SCC p. 560, para 20) 20. N.KOTISWAR SINGH, KH.NOBIN SINGH THONGAM TARUN SINGH- Appellant Versus STATE OF MANIPUR - Respondent Decided On : 2018. Imp Points: ( --- ) N. KOTISWAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard Mr. N. Ibochaoba Singh, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Lailai, learned counsel and Mr. H. Kenajit, learned counsel for the appellants as well as Mr. R.S Thongam Tarun Singh VS State of Manipur - 30 Apr 19. When evidence establishes gang rape, framing of charge merely u/s 376 and not u/s 376(2)(g) not prejudicial to accused. India - Supreme Court. 2. Bhure Bankelal Nunere (Thakor) VS State of Gujarat - 03 Mar 09. |zuy| uwt| idj| tfh| kxb| hvv| dkd| shn| njx| vtc| sgn| wxh| osm| fen| lrw| rnk| ese| ksh| pcv| zzq| tfu| afv| skq| fiy| tov| xzg| shi| ubk| nrt| ljw| twq| uqs| cgu| xff| oac| osg| xqb| pff| agp| rmn| buz| svx| hhi| rmv| hmp| yxl| wbg| ehx| psv| hho|