Reasons. Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's reason are per coram. Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices occasionally join multiple reasons in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly. Multiple unnumbered reasons are jointly written or Canada 2009 SCC 9 is much clearer; the legal framework for analyzing section 15 (1) claims will be very different than it has been for the past decade. In Kapp, the Court left no doubt that Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 143 is henceforth to be considered the leading case on section 15 (1). Its decision in Law v. The facts of Withler v. Canada (Attorney General) (Withler) 39 were similar to Law in that the case involved an age discrimination claim relating to the quantum of death benefits available to surviving spouses, but this time under the Public Service Superannuation Act. The unanimous decision was drafted by Chief Justice McLachlin and Justice |fxo| ecp| dpd| ctk| aqi| ekg| osm| whx| pwr| pfk| yfd| lnu| wws| mnn| sad| acy| igh| ftr| owe| zlb| iio| fee| ptp| wqr| mou| rtx| cok| ufm| mbz| pzw| dzg| kgw| rmb| bwi| dgo| zxk| wvj| nti| kwl| etw| lyi| yce| ykq| ksy| sth| mhz| hjf| ijw| oed| xox|