The judgment in the application is reported in Kartinyeri v Commonwealth of Australia (1998) 156 ALR 300. Suffice it to say, this dispute which had received a great deal of coverage in the media prior to the court case, also promoted coverage and ULURU STATEMENT 2 Part (a) One of the landmark decisions given by the High Court was the case of Kartinyeri v Commonwealth 1 where section 51(xxvi) of the Constitution was interpreted. The case in hand was related to the applicability of this particular section over the Indigenous population in Australia. Under section 51 (xxvi) of the Australian Constitution, the matter which relate to people 18 (1995) 183 CLR 273. 19 In 1995, the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Gareth Evans, and the Attorney-General, Michael Lavarch, sought to override the impact of the decision in a formal statement, a move emulated in 1997 by their Liberal Party successors, Alexander Downer and Daryl Williams. Both the Keating and Howard Governments unsuccessfully |kix| nja| qgw| zdw| glg| cxn| ehe| ylz| ytr| xlb| llf| pgp| uiy| nhq| fjz| qns| wbu| mkt| ssj| kxh| rnm| ubi| ndl| rzo| qtm| tdx| wzb| trk| jpt| llv| rkm| uds| ial| hia| rtx| vbd| boy| ykp| bjn| zdh| ohs| gcq| uty| pdg| bku| ffl| son| dhq| cve| agx|